NOTE: This letter does not represent any views of the Little League Insider Blog.
REMINDER: This blog is not affiliated with Little League Baseball and Softball in anyway
Read the letter by clicking here
Mr Patrick Wilson/Williamsport Rules Committee,
I trust in God. I
love my Country and I will “play fair”.
That’s part of the Little League
pledge written on the back of the rule book.
Little League also added a patch a few years ago to their uniforms worn
at the World Series that says, “I will not cheat”. But with the new school residency rule that
was implemented for this season it’s hard to believe that teams will play fair
or won’t do something that would be conceived as cheating. I am a coach, Board Member and Division
Coordinator in the Stony Point Little League in Stony Point, NY and would like
to take a few moments to share my thoughts on some of the potential changes
presently being contemplated in Little League.
The new school residency rule allows for kids to play where they go to
school. Stretching the boundaries for a
number of little leagues to gain access to more players. A league can now recruit players in the same
school district to play for them. They
don’t even have to live in the same state.
Trust me they won’t be recruiting the average player. They will be looking to take two or three of
your league’s best players to put them over the top for tournament play (All
Stars). For instance, if team A takes 3
of team B’s 5 best players, a game that generally would be a 6-4 game in favor
of Team A, will now likely be a 14-2 game in team A’s favor due to a depleated
Team B. Now Team A can consistently save
their pitching due to the bullying of teams and results of their scores. As they plow through Districts, Sections and
even States until they reach Regionals and face an opponent who likely did the
same thing.
How is this considered fair?
The right thing? In a program that promotes good sportsmanship, it will
now likely be building animosity and resentment between leagues. What about the players and their
families? The 3 players who came over
from the other towns and bumped their children off the team or because they
were recruited they will most likely be starters. This means that three other players will now
have their playing time cut down. That
makes for 6 upset kids and 6 sets of parents that will be angry and bitter
towards the 3 new players. Is this a
good thing? Good luck to those coaches
and the stressful atmosphere they will go through.
The funny thing is, this is exactly what we stopped Taiwan
from doing approximately 20 or so years ago.
Taiwan was getting kids from too big of an area. They were consistently winning the World
Series a majority of the time and in numerous cases embarrassing the US
Champion while doing it. Then
Williamsport tightened the reins if you will to insure a more level playing
field. As a result, the competition and
game results have been much better.
Is it ok now because we are going to let everyone do
it? Is it now not considered cheating
because we’ve changed the rules?
Towns that have more schools will consistently dominate
towns that have fewer schools or none at all.
So now in order to win or “get to Williamsport”, the kids with the
opportunity will likely do so. District
play and Sections would have a lot of blow out scores with the same team
winning year after year. It’s not just
the players who will be jumping ship, it’s the coaches also. Leagues will be decimated, possibly fold or
not join tournament play to avoid embarrassment. The team will no longer be town teams. There won’t be any “Hoosiers” type team
anymore. These teams will now be
considered “travel teams” or “club teams”.
“Super teams” if you will.
These are the types of teams you take to Cooperstown (NY), Diamond
Nation (NJ) or Ripken (Maryland) and other such tournaments across the country.
For the games on ESPN/ABC in Williamsport, people most
likely will not notice the difference.
Super Team vs. Super Team should be evenly matched. Blanketing the decimation of teams along the
way. I don’t understand how this rule
wasn’t voted on by District Administrators.
I could see if it were a matter of safety like all players must wear a
helmet or a cup, these types of bats are illegal, etc. It does become a safety issue however when a
team (tournament play) faces a “super team” with their number 3 pitcher, due to
days rest, etc which in fact is really their number 5 pitcher. That team lost their 2 best pitchers due to
the new school rule. Odds of the balls
flying off the bats in that game will spike.
As a parent you would fear for the safety of the players in the
field. As you can see I can go on and on
with the problems with this rule change.
The other rule that has been rumored to change is the
birthday rule or age change/bracket.
Williamsport is talking about pushing back the cut-off date for each age
bracket to January 1st. The age you will
be that year is the age bracket you will be in.
For example, if you turn 12 December 31st, you are considered a 12 year
old that year. It would take away this year’s 10 year old group of ever having
a chance to play tournament play at the Major Division. There will be no dream of playing in the
Little League World Series. That will be
taken away from them. How horrible is
that. Especially for the kids who have
visited Williamsport. This years 11
year old group will be grandfathered in
Meaning that group can stay in the Majors next year. Falsely giving hope
to this years 10 year olds (who would be considered 12 year olds next year),
that they would have a shot at All Stars and Williamsport. Considering they would have to up against
kids 15-20 months older to make the team.
How could this be considered fair or right? Not that I agree with ANY of the changes
because I don't! But minimally why
wouldn't you grandfather in all of the age groups and start with the new kids
6/7 year olds entering Little League. This way less kids are hurt by the new rule.
I doubt there is little debate that Little League’s biggest
drop-off in enrollment is after a player’s 12 year old year (Majors). I wrote a letter in February of 2010
suggesting that the Juniors (13/14 yr olds) should go to 50/70. To better acclimate themselves for the big
field. To drop it down an age group
would have a terrible effect. Instead of
trying to keep players (13 year olds) in your program you will now lose 12 year
olds. Reason being a lot of 13 years
olds play modified baseball for their middle schools along with a few 12 year
olds. The Little League teams will have
to wait until the school practices and games are over before they can play
their own. Most Leagues won’t be able to
start their games until after 7pm depending upon where the school players are
traveling from. These 50/70 games take a
lot longer than the average little league game 2 ½ hours would be kind, holding
runners on, dropped 3rd strike. If
that’s the case, a lot of these kids won’t be getting home until at least 10pm
on a school night with homework to do.
This is for the regular season. A
number of these kids will still be 11 years old. Technically 12 by Little League
standards. Being that they will turn 12
later that year.
Little Leagues are now told by school coaches that a certain
number of kids can’t pitch for them.
What are these games going to be like if you can’t use your best players
at certain positions. Players to hold
runners on or quality catchers. You
would be lucky to have some of them for the All Stars. But how many could you have to spread out
evenly in your town teams. The
combination of not being able to use certain players and due to the age change
having eleven years olds in the league who can’t handle this type of baseball,
makes for sloppy games.
Generally the scores would most likely be 21-12 or 18-11
range on average. The school players
parents whose kids are now getting home so late will be turned off by Little
League games. I could easily see players
saying, “I am not playing Little League anymore. I am just going to play school ball during
the week and play for a travel team on the weekends”. I couldn’t blame them. In turn, what would be left at the Little
League level. Quality of play will now
be so bad, no one will want to play including coaches. More and more kids will leave Little League
at a younger age than before. Little
League, instead of keeping 13 years olds around, will now lose 11 & 12
year olds. Leagues will fall apart.
These are not good things.
There is a lot more I could say but I believe you can see some of the
problems involving possible rule changes.
Honestly, I don’t want to attack Williamsport. I love everything about it and what it stands
for. I have been coaching, in the major
division, for approximately 16 years and was fortunate to win the State and
reach Bristol, CT in 2010. We lost in
the semi-finals. I have been around, I
hear what other coaches, parents and players are thinking and planning on doing.
I apologize for the way I may have come across. I am just trying to help prevent what I think
would be a disasterous result. Little
League is great the way it is. It should
stop trying to compete with Travel.
Don’t change a thing. Little
League is special because it is unique.
Thank you for taking the time to hear me out.
Brian Coyle
Major Division Coordinator
Major Pirates Manager
Stony Point Little League
Stony Point, NY 10980
Join the Little League World Series discussion on Facebook with some of the best baseball minds around right here: Little League World Series Discussion
Like our Facebook page: Little League Insider
Follow along on Twitter: @LittleLeaguePro
Join the Little League World Series discussion on Facebook with some of the best baseball minds around right here: Little League World Series Discussion
Like our Facebook page: Little League Insider
Follow along on Twitter: @LittleLeaguePro
I know its to early for teams to watch but watch out encino little league to win so Cal & the western regional, they won the so Cal championship as 11s last year will benefit from the residency rule to make team stronger and they have athletic pedigrees with ex NFL all star Rodney pretend managing the team with son Robinson on the roster
ReplyDeleteRodney Peete
ReplyDeleteThats what they said about sherman oaks little league last year ...there is always a team from orange county or san Diego that wins so cal.. the sfv is losing to many players to travel ball , pony , academy etc look at northridge they used to be a powerhouse
ReplyDeleteThe rules don't change a thing really. People who wanted to stretch the rules prior will do it, or be validated now, but they are the great minority. We've all heard stories or experienced something like it if you've been around long enough.
ReplyDeleteThe reality of 50/70 is that it will become the 12-13 year old league of choice over next 4-6 years. Majors will become for 10-11 year olds. I could see Seniors absorbing Juniors and going 14-16. Baseball is changing and LL has to change with it. Have coached for almost 30 years, I remember when the birthday cut-off was July 31st... LL always has transition years where the now "too old" kids can still play for that year. It's a long term decision, not a short-term one, although parents whose kids are caught up in that particular year will feel it is short-term.
The rule changes so far, dropped 3rd strike, 50-70, etc. are good. the game has become more advanced at a younger level, thus the rules need to change with that.